Painting by Cheri Samba

Lokuta eyaka na ascenseur, kasi vérité eyei na escalier mpe ekomi. Lies come up in the elevator; the truth takes the stairs but gets here eventually. - Koffi Olomide

Ésthetique eboma vélo. Aesthetics will kill a bicycle. - Felix Wazekwa

Friday, August 13, 2010

Are authoritarian regimes better at promoting economic growth?

I few days ago, I asked whether Rwanda should follow in Singapore's steps and clamp down on civil liberties in the interest of economic development. In the back of my brain, something was telling me that I had read Kagame's theories about development somewhere before.

Now I remember. The late great Samuel Huntington (of Clash of Civilizations fame), in his book Political Order in Changing Societies, argued that societies go through upheaval during modernization because popular mobilization outpaces the development of political institutions. Huntington fetishized these institutions, in particular political parties and argued that in poor countries it would often be easier for authoritarian regimes to develop these institutions. I am reducing a 500 page book to a paragraph, but bear with me. Huntington, a Harvard professor, later went on to provide advice to the military junta in Brazil, recommending they develop a strong party system before liberalizing the political sphere.

Of course, this elicited a lot of criticism. More recently, Adam Przeworski - an established Polish political scientist who knows something about authoritarian regimes - put Huntington's theory to the test. He examined 135 countries between 1950 and 1990 and did the necessary econometrics to figure out whether authoritarian states were better at developing than democracies. His conclusion:

Indeed, the 56 dictatorships with annual per-capita income of less than $1,000 when we first observed them simply failed to develop. By the exit year, only 18 of them had made it (whether under democracy or continued dictatorship) to $1,000, only 6 to $2,000, and only 3 to more than $3,000. South Korea and Taiwan are exceptional: they are the only two dictatorships that started under $1,000 in 1950 and had annual per-capita income exceeding $5,000 by 1990. If we consider as "initially poor" those countries with less than $2,000, we find that among 98 dictatorships first observed below this level, by the exit year only 26 had made it to $2,000, 15 to $3,000, 7 to $4,000, and 4 to $5,000. These figures should be enough to dispel any notion that dictatorship somehow promotes economic growth in poor countries.

16 comments:

said...

這麼好的部落格,以後看不到怎麼辦啊!!!............................................................

Peter said...

What about BENEVOLENT dictatorships, that is, dictatorships with the country's development at heart?

Jason Stearns said...

How do we know when they are benevolent?

Peter said...

When there's development.

ctribe said...

The question is, whether democracies do any better? What is the empirical causal linkage between political system and level of economic development?

Christopher said...

@Peter...

Presumably Soviet Russia was benevolent then - from a quadi-fuedal society in 1917 to launching Sputnik in 1957...via Lenin, Stalin etc.

Don't confuse development and benevolence, silly.

BenRymer said...

http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2010/08/the-myth-of-authoritarian-growth.html

Peter said...

You all well know what I have in mind: Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Malaysia, China, etc.

India's been democratic for a long time.

The proof is in the pudding. Rwanda is doing very well development-wise, thank you very much. I think even you guys would have to acknowledge that, much as it would pain you to do so.

david Rice said...

Nice article thanks for sharing..
Dissertationmasters.net

jim carry said...

Thank you for give very nice info. Your website is cool I am impressed by the information that you have on this blog. It shows how well you understand this subject. Bookmarked this page, will come back for more.
Buy Essays Online

alex said...

Thank you for sharing your new site. Keep up the great work.
Writing Service Online

Fabian Smith said...

This blog is very informative. i am really impressed by the comments which people have given over here. I am sure many people will get more and more knowledge from this. Cheap Essay Writing
Cheap Term Paper Writing
Cheap Research Paper Writing
Cheap Preliminary Research Writing
Cheap Analyzing Collected Material
Cheap Development and Drafting
Cheap Editing and Proofreading
Cheap Thesis Writing
Cheap Dissertation Writing
Cheap Editing Services
Cheap Proofreading Services
Cheap Letter Writing

Arabella Simson said...

completely awesome! thankz for sharing
Nice one,I appreciate
Airport Taxi

david paul said...

Great work by the blogger this blog really help me. Have a good day! Thanks for sharing.
Custom Essays

jacqueline fernandez said...

Intresting article by the blogger! i must say this article is on of the best for me.
SEO Company

sophia martin said...

Good to see this blog really informative.
Cheap Essay

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.