Painting by Cheri Samba

Lokuta eyaka na ascenseur, kasi vérité eyei na escalier mpe ekomi. Lies come up in the elevator; the truth takes the stairs but gets here eventually. - Koffi Olomide

Ésthetique eboma vélo. Aesthetics will kill a bicycle. - Felix Wazekwa

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Reaction to ICG report from Kinshasa diplomat

In my posting on the Crisis Group report from a couple of days ago, I said I didn't know whether they were right that it would be impossible to hold elections by November 28 and that therefore the opposition and majority should hold talks to postpone the polls. Since then, I have spoken with several Congolese and foreign observers about this, with most backing the Crisis Group analysis, although many Congolese are categorical about respecting the constitutional time limits (i.e. no postponing of elections).

But opinions vary. I decided to reproduce here an email from a western diplomat in Kinshasa who follows these issues closely:
My feeling was that the [ICG] report didn't sufficiently take into account developments in March and April - it was clearly written when we were all deeply concerned by the changes to the Constitution and how they were made, and by the political appointments in CENI, particularly the nomination of Pasteur Mulunda as President. Since then, Mulunda has been at pains to demonstrate CENI's independence by consulting extensively with the Opposition and agreeing a primarily political calendar, against the Majority's preferred option (decouplage). As far as I understand, discussions on the electoral law have also been a series of small victories for the Opposition - Lumanu hasn't even bothered to come defend the Government position during the debate in Parliament. I had hoped that the ICG report might analyse why the Majority was giving the Opposition so much space all of a sudden. Is Kabila basically confident that he can win, and therefore at pains to keep the Opposition on board? What do you think?
On the calendar, I defer to what the experts in PACE and MONUSCO tell me, which is that the calendar is just about achievable but very difficult, with absolutely no space for slippage. Since this is DRC, to me that means it's unlikely the dates will be kept. It's a high-risk strategy for CENI. My guess is they're hoping that by spelling each step out, they can then blame whoever is responsible for the delay - the Parliament if the law takes longer to pass than envisaged (which it is likely to), the international community if any of the procurement or logistics are delayed, Government if it takes too long to disburse, etc.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

When you talk of "the Parliament if the law takes longer to pass than envisaged (which it is likely to), the international community if any of the procurement or logistics are delayed, Government if it takes too long to disburse, etc."

My question still remains is there even a budget to speak of when it comes to the DRC 2011 elections ? I mean we also have to start from somewhere....

Jason Stearns said...

Yes, there is a budget. I'll try to see if they allow me to post it.

Anonymous said...

I didnt know that an election budget would actually be a secret and kept away from the public or should i refer to them as tax payers.

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.